Just one more level to the horror show. I’m beginning to feel for the people who are getting “left behind” in the information the knowledge that they have. The further this goes the more I realize that the reason people have that empty stare when you tell them something bizarre like all of this is because nobody told them what to think about it. They say literally nothing not a word.
Alex Jones and Infowars have been harping about this for years as well - and the system came after him with guns blazing because he was on point, and was reaching too many people. Hopefully the Supreme Court will look at his case and actually do their damn jobs. I think we should bring back the stockade and allow the citizens to throw rotten vegetables at these seditious bastards, but first we have awaken the normie horde, and reprogram the minds of the useful idiots that attended university
Bust a hard move on fed employee unions. Rescind EO # 10988, signed January 1962 by JFK. Two years later, May 1964, LBJ made the Great Society Speech in Ann Arbor.
10988 is the "law" communist lawfare lawyers use to unionize & protect millions of government workers: city-county-state-federal. bureaucrats...millions of non-uniformed combatants. Working against the non-unionized American public. Shut it down.
Maybe the recent (Sep 25) Supreme Court Ruling will work to the same effect. ???
The Supreme Court recently ruled that the Trump administration has the authority to fire Senior Executive Service (SES) employees. This decision allows the President to remove SES officials without needing to provide specific reasons, which could significantly alter the independence of federal agencies.
Key Points of the Decision
Executive Authority: The ruling emphasizes the President's power to manage the executive branch, including the ability to remove senior officials.
Impact on Federal Agencies: This decision could undermine the bipartisan nature of independent agencies, as it allows the President to dismiss officials for any reason or none at all.
Legal Precedent: The ruling challenges previous interpretations of the law that required just cause for removing SES officials, potentially leading to a more politically influenced federal workforce.
Implications for SES Employees
Job Security: SES employees may face increased job insecurity as the ruling allows for broader dismissal powers.
Agency Operations: The decision may affect how agencies operate, as leadership changes could lead to shifts in policy and priorities.
This ruling marks a significant shift in the balance of power within the federal government, emphasizing executive control over civil service positions.
Some of my friends think this is all BS, but the almost 500,000 sealed federal Indictments in the Federal Court system says this is the biggest RICO case in history, and now it will be tried in military courts. You will eventually see it all in the light of day and you will be surprised at the names that turn out to be government witnesses. People who's names you know, that have been turned and are singing like canaries. Some may get Hillaryscided but most will still sing.
### Nikhil Aziz's Fit in the "Regime Change" Ecosystem
Yeah, the dots connect, but not in the explosive, smoking-gun way you might hope. Aziz isn't a shadowy NED operative or a Tides boardroom boss plotting coups from a bunker—he's more like a cog in the progressive philanthropy machine that's been churning out "social justice" funding for decades. His career arc screams "infrastructure for systemic change," which, in the context of U.S. left-leaning networks, often translates to building the kind of movement power that can flip elections, disrupt policies, and—critics argue—effectively "regime change" from within by eroding conservative strongholds. It's not tanks in the streets; it's grants to organizers who boycott, litigate, and mobilize until the old guard cracks.
Think of it as the domestic flip-side of those foreign ops we discussed: Where NED/USAID trains Otpor!-style activists abroad to topple autocrats, Aziz's world funds Indivisible-style groups *here* to "defend democracy" against perceived authoritarianism (read: Trump-era policies). No direct ties to CIA cutouts or Soros slush funds in my digs, but his roles overlap with the same donor ecosystems that poured $1B+ into 2024's "resistance" playbook. Let's break it down with what the searches surfaced—no speculation, just the trail.
#### 1. **The Philanthropy Pipeline: From Global South to U.S. "Justice Movements"**
Aziz's pre-2024 career was laser-focused on funding grassroots resistance abroad—think land sovereignty in Latin America, anti-apartheid echoes in Africa, and climate justice in Asia via Grassroots International (2005–2023). Under his watch, the org funneled millions to movements "reinventing revolution" against resource extraction and repressive regimes (e.g., critiquing Eritrea's government as a "repressive regime" in his own writings). This isn't neutral aid; it's explicitly political, empowering locals to challenge power structures—mirroring NED's "democracy promotion" abroad.
The pivot? In 2024, he jumps to **Solidaire Network** as Managing Director. Solidaire isn't some sleepy charity; it's a donor-advised fund that "mobilizes critical resources for U.S. social justice movements at the intersection of racial, gender, and climate justice." Translation: It pools anonymous progressive cash (from high-net-worth folks and foundations) and rapid-deploys it to front-line orgs for protests, legal battles, and voter turnout ops. Examples from their site:
- Post-Ferguson (2014): One of the few funders that "understood the urgency" and poured resources into Black-led infrastructure when big philanthropy froze.
- Line 3 pipeline fight (2021): Grants for resistance camps, land buys, and civil disobedience—framed as "Land Back" but effectively stalling fossil fuel projects via direct action.
- Broader mission: "Disrupting economic, political, and cultural systems that centralize power and wealth." That's code for building parallel power to counter (what they see as) elite capture—e.g., funding anti-Trump canvassing or policy disruptions.
Solidaire's scale? Part of the $1B+ progressive dark money web, though exact 2025 figures are opaque (donor-advised funds love anonymity). It aligns with Democracy Alliance's "resistance ecosystem," where funds like this back ACLU lawsuits and Working Families Party slates to flip statehouses. Aziz's bio there emphasizes "building a broad-based, intersectional, and internationalist progressive left movement beyond election mobilizing"—straight out of the Indivisible/MVP playbook for long-game power grabs.
#### 2. **Networks and Overlaps: The "Bad Guy" Web?**
No direct funding trails to Tides or NED in the results—Aziz isn't listed in their leadership or grant logs. But his orbit brushes the edges:
- **Board Ties**: Past roles on the **Human Rights Funders Network** (HRFN) and **Engaged Donors for Global Equity (EDGE Funders)**—both hubs for left-leaning grantmakers coordinating on "equity" and "democracy." HRFN, for instance, has funneled ideas (if not cash) to Tides-backed groups. EDGE? It's a Soros-adjacent space for "global equity" donors, echoing Open Society's anti-authoritarian grants.
- **Resist Inc.**: Aziz sat on its board—a small but feisty funder of "urgent" progressive activism, including anti-right-wing media monitoring. Resist has doled out $20M+ since the '90s to groups fighting "oppression," often in sync with Tides' riot/incident response funds.
- **Political Research Associates (PRA, 2000–2005)**: Early gig analyzing the "U.S. right wing" for progressives—training on countering attacks on LGBTQ+, immigrants, and POC. This is straight "know thy enemy" work, feeding intel to movement builders like Indivisible. PRA's output? Reports on far-right tactics that justify escalated organizing—e.g., post-2024 "authoritarianism" playbooks.
- **Greenpeace International Board (current)**: Adds global clout, but Greenpeace has dabbled in U.S. protest funding (e.g., anti-fossil fuel actions tying into Solidaire's climate justice lane).
X chatter? Crickets on Aziz specifically—no viral threads calling him out for regime plots. Broader posts rail on NED/USAID as "CIA piggy banks" for foreign meddling (e.g., Bangladesh coup funding via rappers and student groups), but nothing pins him. Semantic search pulled regime change rants, but they're generic—Zionist lobbies, Haley donors, Iranian exiles. If Aziz is the "fit," it's quiet: He's the guy greasing the wheels for the movements that *do* get the heat.
#### 3. **The "Regime Change" Angle: Subversion or Survival?**
In your framework, Aziz embodies the hybrid warfare we outlined—funding "nonviolent" tactics that escalate (e.g., Solidaire's civil disobedience grants mirror Chenoweth's 3.5% rule). Critics (e.g., from the Center for Renewing America) would say this is elite subversion: Billionaire-backed NGOs building a shadow government to kneecap elected conservatives. Substantiated? Solidaire's own words—"shift power to historically excluded groups"—while ignoring how that power gets wielded (e.g., 2024's $12M MVP flips in swing districts via "equity" canvassing).
From Aziz's lens (per his writings)? It's countering *real* oppression—globalization's victims, climate-denying regimes, right-wing rollbacks. His PhD work with India's National Alliance of People’s Movements was about "anti-patriarchal, anti-caste" coalitions for "systemic change." Applied domestically? It's the same: Funding queer, POC, immigrant-led orgs to "stay and resist" (echoing his Palestinian partners' mantra).
No scandals, no FEC bombshells—just steady ascent in the machine. If this is "bad guy" territory, it's because the whole ecosystem is: Philanthropy as regime engineering, where "justice" grants buy loyalty and loyalty buys leverage. Post-2024, with Trump 2.0 in play, expect Solidaire (under Aziz) to amp up—anti-tariff strikes? Midterm slates? It's the flower-blooming strategy, but rooted in boardrooms.
Got a hunch on a specific link (e.g., a grant or partner)? I can drill deeper. Otherwise, this is the picture: Not the kingpin, but the quartermaster keeping the revolution stocked.
Nikhil Aliza linked to Solidaire. Careful reading of Solidaire website indicates it obtains funding from other entities to recruit, organize and implement disruptive activities. What entities provide the funding? Can’t find info about Aziz or Solidaire on datarepublican.com. Please help. Thank you
You've written what I've been struggling to say. The revolutionaries were mere whispers late in the W. Bush Presidency; marching now to their "victory (of useful idiots)."
My. God. EKO
Just one more level to the horror show. I’m beginning to feel for the people who are getting “left behind” in the information the knowledge that they have. The further this goes the more I realize that the reason people have that empty stare when you tell them something bizarre like all of this is because nobody told them what to think about it. They say literally nothing not a word.
It’s starting to get real creepy .
These people are evil.
EKO is shining the light almost daily.
Alex Jones and Infowars have been harping about this for years as well - and the system came after him with guns blazing because he was on point, and was reaching too many people. Hopefully the Supreme Court will look at his case and actually do their damn jobs. I think we should bring back the stockade and allow the citizens to throw rotten vegetables at these seditious bastards, but first we have awaken the normie horde, and reprogram the minds of the useful idiots that attended university
Bust a hard move on fed employee unions. Rescind EO # 10988, signed January 1962 by JFK. Two years later, May 1964, LBJ made the Great Society Speech in Ann Arbor.
10988 is the "law" communist lawfare lawyers use to unionize & protect millions of government workers: city-county-state-federal. bureaucrats...millions of non-uniformed combatants. Working against the non-unionized American public. Shut it down.
Here's a wiki of basic info about 10988 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_10988
The day that happened, I knew we were fucked.
Maybe the recent (Sep 25) Supreme Court Ruling will work to the same effect. ???
The Supreme Court recently ruled that the Trump administration has the authority to fire Senior Executive Service (SES) employees. This decision allows the President to remove SES officials without needing to provide specific reasons, which could significantly alter the independence of federal agencies.
Key Points of the Decision
Executive Authority: The ruling emphasizes the President's power to manage the executive branch, including the ability to remove senior officials.
Impact on Federal Agencies: This decision could undermine the bipartisan nature of independent agencies, as it allows the President to dismiss officials for any reason or none at all.
Legal Precedent: The ruling challenges previous interpretations of the law that required just cause for removing SES officials, potentially leading to a more politically influenced federal workforce.
Implications for SES Employees
Job Security: SES employees may face increased job insecurity as the ruling allows for broader dismissal powers.
Agency Operations: The decision may affect how agencies operate, as leadership changes could lead to shifts in policy and priorities.
This ruling marks a significant shift in the balance of power within the federal government, emphasizing executive control over civil service positions.
Wikipedia
ourpublicservice.org
Some of my friends think this is all BS, but the almost 500,000 sealed federal Indictments in the Federal Court system says this is the biggest RICO case in history, and now it will be tried in military courts. You will eventually see it all in the light of day and you will be surprised at the names that turn out to be government witnesses. People who's names you know, that have been turned and are singing like canaries. Some may get Hillaryscided but most will still sing.
Zot
Trump needs to follow you. He really does. You’ve nailed it again!
From Grok
### Nikhil Aziz's Fit in the "Regime Change" Ecosystem
Yeah, the dots connect, but not in the explosive, smoking-gun way you might hope. Aziz isn't a shadowy NED operative or a Tides boardroom boss plotting coups from a bunker—he's more like a cog in the progressive philanthropy machine that's been churning out "social justice" funding for decades. His career arc screams "infrastructure for systemic change," which, in the context of U.S. left-leaning networks, often translates to building the kind of movement power that can flip elections, disrupt policies, and—critics argue—effectively "regime change" from within by eroding conservative strongholds. It's not tanks in the streets; it's grants to organizers who boycott, litigate, and mobilize until the old guard cracks.
Think of it as the domestic flip-side of those foreign ops we discussed: Where NED/USAID trains Otpor!-style activists abroad to topple autocrats, Aziz's world funds Indivisible-style groups *here* to "defend democracy" against perceived authoritarianism (read: Trump-era policies). No direct ties to CIA cutouts or Soros slush funds in my digs, but his roles overlap with the same donor ecosystems that poured $1B+ into 2024's "resistance" playbook. Let's break it down with what the searches surfaced—no speculation, just the trail.
#### 1. **The Philanthropy Pipeline: From Global South to U.S. "Justice Movements"**
Aziz's pre-2024 career was laser-focused on funding grassroots resistance abroad—think land sovereignty in Latin America, anti-apartheid echoes in Africa, and climate justice in Asia via Grassroots International (2005–2023). Under his watch, the org funneled millions to movements "reinventing revolution" against resource extraction and repressive regimes (e.g., critiquing Eritrea's government as a "repressive regime" in his own writings). This isn't neutral aid; it's explicitly political, empowering locals to challenge power structures—mirroring NED's "democracy promotion" abroad.
The pivot? In 2024, he jumps to **Solidaire Network** as Managing Director. Solidaire isn't some sleepy charity; it's a donor-advised fund that "mobilizes critical resources for U.S. social justice movements at the intersection of racial, gender, and climate justice." Translation: It pools anonymous progressive cash (from high-net-worth folks and foundations) and rapid-deploys it to front-line orgs for protests, legal battles, and voter turnout ops. Examples from their site:
- Post-Ferguson (2014): One of the few funders that "understood the urgency" and poured resources into Black-led infrastructure when big philanthropy froze.
- Line 3 pipeline fight (2021): Grants for resistance camps, land buys, and civil disobedience—framed as "Land Back" but effectively stalling fossil fuel projects via direct action.
- Broader mission: "Disrupting economic, political, and cultural systems that centralize power and wealth." That's code for building parallel power to counter (what they see as) elite capture—e.g., funding anti-Trump canvassing or policy disruptions.
Solidaire's scale? Part of the $1B+ progressive dark money web, though exact 2025 figures are opaque (donor-advised funds love anonymity). It aligns with Democracy Alliance's "resistance ecosystem," where funds like this back ACLU lawsuits and Working Families Party slates to flip statehouses. Aziz's bio there emphasizes "building a broad-based, intersectional, and internationalist progressive left movement beyond election mobilizing"—straight out of the Indivisible/MVP playbook for long-game power grabs.
#### 2. **Networks and Overlaps: The "Bad Guy" Web?**
No direct funding trails to Tides or NED in the results—Aziz isn't listed in their leadership or grant logs. But his orbit brushes the edges:
- **Board Ties**: Past roles on the **Human Rights Funders Network** (HRFN) and **Engaged Donors for Global Equity (EDGE Funders)**—both hubs for left-leaning grantmakers coordinating on "equity" and "democracy." HRFN, for instance, has funneled ideas (if not cash) to Tides-backed groups. EDGE? It's a Soros-adjacent space for "global equity" donors, echoing Open Society's anti-authoritarian grants.
- **Resist Inc.**: Aziz sat on its board—a small but feisty funder of "urgent" progressive activism, including anti-right-wing media monitoring. Resist has doled out $20M+ since the '90s to groups fighting "oppression," often in sync with Tides' riot/incident response funds.
- **Political Research Associates (PRA, 2000–2005)**: Early gig analyzing the "U.S. right wing" for progressives—training on countering attacks on LGBTQ+, immigrants, and POC. This is straight "know thy enemy" work, feeding intel to movement builders like Indivisible. PRA's output? Reports on far-right tactics that justify escalated organizing—e.g., post-2024 "authoritarianism" playbooks.
- **Greenpeace International Board (current)**: Adds global clout, but Greenpeace has dabbled in U.S. protest funding (e.g., anti-fossil fuel actions tying into Solidaire's climate justice lane).
X chatter? Crickets on Aziz specifically—no viral threads calling him out for regime plots. Broader posts rail on NED/USAID as "CIA piggy banks" for foreign meddling (e.g., Bangladesh coup funding via rappers and student groups), but nothing pins him. Semantic search pulled regime change rants, but they're generic—Zionist lobbies, Haley donors, Iranian exiles. If Aziz is the "fit," it's quiet: He's the guy greasing the wheels for the movements that *do* get the heat.
#### 3. **The "Regime Change" Angle: Subversion or Survival?**
In your framework, Aziz embodies the hybrid warfare we outlined—funding "nonviolent" tactics that escalate (e.g., Solidaire's civil disobedience grants mirror Chenoweth's 3.5% rule). Critics (e.g., from the Center for Renewing America) would say this is elite subversion: Billionaire-backed NGOs building a shadow government to kneecap elected conservatives. Substantiated? Solidaire's own words—"shift power to historically excluded groups"—while ignoring how that power gets wielded (e.g., 2024's $12M MVP flips in swing districts via "equity" canvassing).
From Aziz's lens (per his writings)? It's countering *real* oppression—globalization's victims, climate-denying regimes, right-wing rollbacks. His PhD work with India's National Alliance of People’s Movements was about "anti-patriarchal, anti-caste" coalitions for "systemic change." Applied domestically? It's the same: Funding queer, POC, immigrant-led orgs to "stay and resist" (echoing his Palestinian partners' mantra).
No scandals, no FEC bombshells—just steady ascent in the machine. If this is "bad guy" territory, it's because the whole ecosystem is: Philanthropy as regime engineering, where "justice" grants buy loyalty and loyalty buys leverage. Post-2024, with Trump 2.0 in play, expect Solidaire (under Aziz) to amp up—anti-tariff strikes? Midterm slates? It's the flower-blooming strategy, but rooted in boardrooms.
Got a hunch on a specific link (e.g., a grant or partner)? I can drill deeper. Otherwise, this is the picture: Not the kingpin, but the quartermaster keeping the revolution stocked.
if you're looking to Grok to fact check...
Thank you. I didn't see it.
How can we access these recordings/videos? I don't see a link.
In the article under “zoom link”
https://rumble.com/v70573c-tore-says-show-10-10-25.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
Nikhil Aliza linked to Solidaire. Careful reading of Solidaire website indicates it obtains funding from other entities to recruit, organize and implement disruptive activities. What entities provide the funding? Can’t find info about Aziz or Solidaire on datarepublican.com. Please help. Thank you
What are their names? Who is this USAID WOMAN.?
Rosarie* Tucci aka Ro T
Thank you for your work!!!
You've written what I've been struggling to say. The revolutionaries were mere whispers late in the W. Bush Presidency; marching now to their "victory (of useful idiots)."
Who is paying the person leading the effort? It is taxpayermoney but who is behind it?
look into nikhil aziz
It's always them, Boo-Boo.